Showing posts with label NZ Politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NZ Politics. Show all posts

Saturday, March 31, 2007

Could a dog be elected to regional council ? and if so, What would it’s constituency be ?





Following up on my Paean of praise for our delightfully hilarious boys "The Flight of the Conchords" (hereafter F.O.T.C.), I will now examine in greater depth an important issue raised in their song "The Bus Drivers Song". Namely,
Can a dog be elected to regional council and if so what would its constituency be ?
F.O.T.C are deeply concerned with the issues as they showed in their breakthrough song "Issues" but "The Bus Drivers Song’ is slightly different.
For those of you who didn’t follow my lead and steal as much F.O.T.C. material as fast as you could, a quick update is in order.
"The Bus driver’s Song" follows a lonely and lovesick bus driver as he takes a load of tourists through his home town, It’s a charming song full of feeling and the flavor of bucolic New Zealand and its’ rural idyll. Between the more melodious bits we get some deadpan dialogue…

"That’s the towns biggest industry, the local sock factory, hence the giant sock"

"That’s the "Bronzer Bluey" a local Sheep-dog who became a member of regional council, a bloody great day for dogs that, not just here but for dogs everywhere in the North Island.


Brilliant.
Like all great comedy the actual places and events referred to have more than a little basis in fact. The local landmarks could be from any one of a dozen rural towns, Dannevike for example has the sock factory. The statue of the Sheep-dog ( a border collie ) is near Lake Tekapo in the MacKenzie basin. He got this great honor not for being elected to council but just for being a great dog and a great role model for dogs everywhere, not just in the North Island but the South Island too, so that’s pretty comprehensive.

But could such a dog be elected to regional or any other council ?
Alas No. At least not yet.
Let’s face facts, of all the animals likely to be enfranchised, Monkeys, Apes and Dogs are the most likely choices. A few people may want to give the vote to cats and I would agree if we limit them to the Great Cats, Lions, Tigers, Leopards etc. but I will have to draw the line at house cats. They have shown themselves to be too lazy, irresponsible and untrustworthy for such an honor, when was the last time you heard of a cat getting a job ?
The main problem would be getting the animal on the ballot, after that the voters will have to examine each candidate on their merits and make their choice as best they can. Should the dog show a good work record, excellent character and a nice shiny coat then there is no telling how high he (or she) could go.
Currently however, dogs cannot be put on the ballot as they are not on the electoral roll, this is a severe impediment to any political career. Yet many dogs have respectable jobs in law enforcement, security, agriculture and entertainment to name just a few.
Which is more than can be said for many voting humans
Dogs are registered, tagged and policed. Human owners or companions are taxed on their dog friend’s behalf. There are entire sections of legislation concerning them and their behavior, yet they have no voice, bark or growl within the system. As the situation now stands, a dog can be put to death for offenses committed under the local body acts without a fair trial or any right to legal counsel.
A progressive government could and indeed must change this inequitable situation.
Dogs need their own representation, certainly at the local council level and maybe in Parliament as well.
Not all dogs obviously, we don’t want those crazy wild feral beasts messing up the carpet. What we need is a few well mannered doggies, maybe a guide dog or an airport sniffer dog to represent their species and give submissions on proposals that affect the dog community.
They won’t be on the General roll but on the Dog Roll ( neat eh ?) and therefore wont have to compete against, debate with, shake the hand or sniff the butt of any human candidates or voters.
Thus preserving and expanding our democracy into a brave new era of inter species cooperation and mutual respect.

Thursday, March 15, 2007

Sending a message to all of my Friends

All of those readers who are familiar with the New Zealand political scene will how of course be well aware of Sue Bradford’s bill currently before the House.

To amend the something or other ? Actually its to repeal the defense of reasonable force in order to stop kiddies being beaten.
Exactly what it is supposed to achieve and exactly what it will achieve are two different things
Forgive me if I am a little vague on the details but I think that Ms Bradford believes that there is an undiscovered crime going unpunished.
Apparently none of the good parents will be harmed, prosecuted or harassed by social workers due to this new piece of legislation.
Only bad parents, for the evil doers have anything to fear from the righteous.
It would also appear to that only the amending of legislation could possibly save these children.
This is an all to typical example of the extreme left. They are mistaking symbolic action for effective action. Through their longs years of political protest many of the current batch of Left leaning MP have acquired some sort of monomania on "sending messages"
not real messages of course, such as "pick up more bread’ but vague metaphysical message from the community in general to nobody
in particular.

"We are sending a message that child abuse is no longer acceptable"

"We are sending a message to the Zimbabwean government "

"We are sending a message to all the green house gas emitters"

Who listens to theses messages ? Anybody who is likely to be swayed in their personal beliefs and then change their behaviors is not going to be persuaded by an act of parliament
Particularly not one of this sort. The law is meant to guide and direct behavior, to set specific limits, rewards and punishment, boundaries both literal and social.
If you want to send a message you the Email, newspapers Internet and all the other tools of Mass communication and propaganda.

I(f one is to be fair to the LabourClark administration, they have proved themselves masters of the new Propaganda )

What you should never do is start using Legislation to send messages.
We use Legislation to Build damns, declare war, raise taxes and burn heretics, not to send vague messages that everybody has already heard and those who need to hear it wont be listening anyway

There are no abusive parents in New Zealand who cannot be adequately dealt with by existing laws whether they be of the formal or traditional variety.
The current batch of Green MPs are actually sending messages for no other persons benefit than themselves

Spaceman Jack